fostering the humanistic practice of medicine publishing personal accounts of illness and healing encouraging health care advocacy

Search
Close this search box.

fostering the humanistic practice of medicine publishing personal accounts of illness and healing encouraging health care advocacy

Search
Close this search box.
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Stories
  4. /
  5. Letter From the Dead

Letter From the Dead

Gross Anatomy class is a rite of passage, and has been so for a few hundred years. Generations of first-year medical students have spent months dissecting cadavers and painstakingly learning the intricacies of human anatomy.

I well remember my first day of class—the overpowering smell of formaldehyde and the unnerving sight of a roomful of twenty-five dead people lying supine, their faces and genitals covered, on metal tables.

Assigned by the alphabet, four students to a cadaver, my peers and I (Fabert, Ferris, Flamm and Fleming—my maiden name) stood gingerly next to our cadaver, careful not to get too close. We shifted uneasily. Touching our cadaver (a woman) for the first time, even with gloves on, was disquieting.

Making the first incision was difficult, to say the least. We hid our feelings by joking, by acting unaffected, by pretending to be callous—and then, worst of all, with time, by truly becoming callous.

Our first job was to flip our cadavers over, face down, and dissect the skin off the back, exposing the large back muscles. Not very hard to do, but since we didn’t know how to dissect, we needed to start somewhere easy.

Despite their best efforts, the table next to us did a terrible job, halfway destroying some long back muscles in the process. I still remember, it was the quadratus lumborum that was frayed and chopped up by their inexperienced efforts. We solemnly renamed it the “quadratus lawnmorus,” since it looked like it had been run over by a lawnmower.

In long afternoon sessions, as the weeks and months went by, we learned how to delicately dissect, teasing out important structures and separating them from the surrounding skin, fat and muscle, so we could see and memorize the paths of nerves and arteries, the attachment points of muscles, the glistening geometry of bone and joints. It was all miraculous, really, until it became just a lot of hard work.

As the semester progressed, we thought less and less of our cadavers as people and more and more of them as just cadavers—not human beings, but test material to be learned, like the Krebs cycle or the structure of a cell.

And it seemed that every time my team and I dissected a new body part on our cadaver, she would have a rare variation—a blood vessel, nerve or tendon that branched differently from those of 99 percent of humans—so we’d have to learn the normal configuration on someone else’s cadaver. Annoying.

When we dissected her right knee, we found nothing recognizable: The patella was irregular and misshapen, the joint almost obliterated. Terrible arthritis. When we used the electric saw to open skulls, hers was almost impossible to cut through, it was so thick.

Finally, we were able to remove the top of the skull, revealing an amazingly thick, bony right inner skull. We stared, puzzled.

Our instructor leaned in, had a look and pronounced, “Calcified subdural hematoma. She must have had one hell of a head injury.” The small and large intestines revealed lots of scarring from some long-ago abdominal surgery.

Our cadaver couldn’t have known how she would die, but we did. When it came time to dissect the heart, her pericardium was full of hardened dried blood. She’d had an aortic root rupture, with her pericardium quickly filling with blood and compressing the heart, and a quick death. Painless, I hoped.

At long last, we finished dissecting our cadavers. It was the end of the semester, and the final day of Gross Anatomy. The cadavers would be cremated; we would attend a ceremony thanking them for the gift of their bodies, and the ashes would be returned to their families. For now, we were just glad that the final exam was over, and that, going forward, we wouldn’t smell like formaldehyde after our long afternoon sessions.

Dr. McCreight, the shy, self-effacing Southern gentleman assistant in the lab, silently appeared next to our cadaver. Ken, Darren, Bruce and I were wrapping up the remains in wet gauze and heavy canvas, as we did each evening when dissection was finished.

“I have something for you,” said Dr. McCreight. “Please come to my office.”

We looked at each other, wide-eyed. Were we in trouble? Nobody ever got called to Dr. McCreight’s office. Wordlessly, we followed him and sank into the old vinyl chairs in his cluttered nook of an office. Slowly and precisely, he picked up an envelope from the center of his desk, handing it to me.

“It’s a letter from your cadaver,” he said. “She wrote it for the students who would dissect her. Now seems like the right time for you to have it.”

I held the blue onionskin paper, reading the precise, beautiful penmanship.

“Dear young doctors,” it began. As I read aloud, the smelly cadaver—the source of so many hours of study, frustration and late-night work—instantly became a person.

She had grown up in eastern North Carolina, studied to be a teacher and had a long and fulfilling career at NC School for the Blind. Never married, she had spent her teacher’s salary traveling. She listed the ailments she thought we might find as we dissected her. She described the exciting trip to New York City when she was in her twenties, and the terrible taxicab accident that left her in a coma for several months. She recovered slowly but completely. (Aha! The calcified hematoma in her skull!)

She’d always limped on her right knee, the one injured in the accident. As she aged, she developed terrible arthritis and in her later years walked with a cane. Now we understood the terribly distorted knee joint. She’d had appendicitis, and a long, complicated hospitalization, which explained the intestinal scarring we’d found.

She told us she was proud of us (she didn’t even know us!) and hoped she had been helpful to us.

The letter burned my fingers. I could hardly hold it, thinking: If she only knew how much we had joked about her, had been frustrated by her and, by the end of the class, had taken her for granted.

Dr. McCreight was right to wait until the end of the class to give us the letter. Had we read it at the beginning, I don’t think we could have dissected her. She would have been too much of a person—too real, too grandmotherly. As it was, it was all we could do to wrap her up one final time and say goodbye.

It’s been many years since Gross Anatomy, and I’ve had plenty of time to reflect on the class, and on her gift to us.

My will includes written instructions for my body to be donated to the medical school I attended. I’ve filled out all the paperwork. They may or may not want it; I’ve had so many joints replaced, the students will have a tough time learning shoulder, hip and knee anatomy from my remains. But perhaps I can still be useful.

And I will write a letter to the students. Believe me, I know what I’ll be putting them through!

Ann F. Beach is a pediatric hospitalist turned writer, a lover of diagnostic dilemmas, and a student of the history of medicine. She was lucky enough to have a wonderful thirty-nine-year medical career (Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine) and enjoyed almost every day of it. “While working, I dabbled in writing and had several essays published. Now retired, I’ve turned my attention to completing a long-dreamed-of book on pediatric medical mysteries.”

Comments

23 thoughts on “Letter From the Dead”

  1. Dear Dr. Beach,
    Thank you for sharing your story; it took me right back to First Year anatomy lab as well. It motivates me to consider donating my body with a letter–we shall see.

  2. Tina Castañares MD

    Meaningful story, thank you! Like some of your other readers here, I’m going to write such a letter myself. My arrangements for whole body donation are already made.

  3. Thank you so much for the vulnerability in writing this. It was lovely to read and I instantly cried when that letter came out. She let you in on her life to allow for connection! I look forward to reading more of your writing.

  4. I love the letter and how it humanized the woman. I also admire her, you, and all those who donate their bodies to science.

  5. Friends have suggested I donate my bode but the idea of lying nude in front of medical students, some of whom would joke, I know from that same friend, was too much for me. My husband laughs and says I’ll be dead and won’t know it. I know it NOW, I tell him. Thank you for giving such a clear, honest description of what it’s like. I still plan to be cremated but am grateful to those who offer learning to students like you.

  6. Thank you for this essay. Your experience with anatomy lab and your cadaver was surprisingly uplifting and well told.

  7. So inspiring that it reminded me to energize my Pulse subscription, send this to several friends, and…perhaps write a letter of my own. What a beautiful legacy this woman left you all.

  8. This is a wonderful essay. My wife donated her body when she died two years ago, and “we” had a similar experience
    I am going to donate also
    I wrote an essay about the experience published in the Washington Post. I have been teaching first year medical students at Georgetown for over thirty years
    You wrote a wonderful piece
    thank you
    I will send you the essay Ted

  9. Louis Verardo, MD, FAAFP

    Dr. Beach, I read your piece just now and found it very moving. I don’t think I’ve ever come across any prior writing about anatomy class quite like what you described. I am sure your decision to donate your body to the medical school would have pleased the author of that letter you received from Dr. McCreight on your final day of dissection. And please be gentle with yourself, you and your three other lab partners: dissecting a deceased human being is not a normal experience at all, and it occurs within days of your arrival at medical school. What seems macabre is actually a necessary first step in socializing us as physicians: we overcome our horror at what seems a desecration of the dead, so that we may offer learned treatments and procedures to the living throughout our careers. Creating some emotional distance is a defense mechanism, not an act of disrespect, and the need for such distance diminishes the more we understand and embrace the special nature of our craft.
    Thank you for sharing your story with all of us.

  10. Thankyou. I have completed paperwork, too, to donate my body for anatomy class. After reading this, I’ll write a letter, too.
    I switched from being an Art major to Nursing because the nurse’s first class was lab anatomy-not available to (although desirable for) art majors. It was the most valuable course I took. At UMi we nursing students were very respectful of our cadavers, as was expected.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *