fostering the humanistic practice of medicine publishing personal accounts of illness and healing encouraging health care advocacy

Search
Close this search box.

fostering the humanistic practice of medicine publishing personal accounts of illness and healing encouraging health care advocacy

Search
Close this search box.

Feeding Tubes – To Place or Not to Place?

Sometimes I have to pinch myself. Is this really my twenty-fifth year of practice as a palliative care physician? My head is full of memories of caring for hundreds of patients as they navigate their final days of life.

I think of the first patient I placed on hospice in my first week of practice as a newly minted attending. At eighty-eight years old, Mrs. C. had been perfectly functional and even driving herself. But now she arrived at rehab after a sudden massive stroke. Her daughters were holding out hope for improvement. She was unable to maintain nutrition due to dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and a feeding tube was placed in the hospital. Her oldest said, “We were told this was temporary, and the tube could be removed anytime.”

We moved Mrs. C. into intensive rehabilitation. She made minor progress, but a month later was still unable to walk, talk or eat.

Mrs. C. looked miserable, but her family kept hoping for a miracle. Ninety days passed with no measurable improvement. She would need custodial care.

It was the harsh reality of economics that made the daughters agreeable to having a realistic conversation with us. “We were told we could pull the tube at any time. That’s why we went with it.” “Are we killing mom if we stop feeding?” “But she would never have wanted to live on a tube when the rest of her body is not cooperating.”

A few minutes later, again “But will we be killing mom if we stop feeding? Will God ever forgive us?”

And, “I wish we had never agreed to a tube. We made her miserable for nothing. We robbed her of the chance to have a peaceful journey.”

It was an emotional conversation as these tend to be. We as medical professionals have to be careful with saying “feeding tubes may be temporary and can be removed at any time” because even though ethically withholding versus withdrawal of feeding maybe theoretically equal, the trauma of making a decision to withdraw is exceedingly painful.

After deliberation, the daughters agreed to hospice. Within days, she had another massive stroke and became unresponsive and regurgitated feeding. The decision to stop was not difficult for the family anymore.

The daughters told us, “Mom made a decision for herself and spared us agony. We are not sure if we could’ve lived with ourselves had we stopped feeding. She was a wonderful mom even at the end!”

Neeta Nayak
Richardson, Texas

Comments

6 thoughts on “Feeding Tubes – To Place or Not to Place?”

  1. Beautifully written. Another story that emphasizes the need for important conversations BEFORE illness strikes. Encourage all your elderly patients to fill out advanced directives—be specific about their choices and the implications thereof.

  2. Thank you for sharing this enlightening story. Some conversations are hard to have but we must have them. Truly we need to talk about advanced care planning with our patients. we can avoid a lot of these if we know the patient’s wishes.
    Congratulations on a great read!

  3. Thanks for sharing this wonderful story that encapsulate the struggle that families and physicians face when dealing with difficult end of life decisions.

  4. Aspiration pneumonia exist. With GTUBE IF HEAD NOT KEPT ELEVATED. I guess both neurologist and. The hospitalist did not have open discussion or they did not have guts to disclose and dumped on SAR / palliative team to deal with this family list of discussions
    I as SAR VISTING INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN HAD ONE Pt come from UIC AT CHICAGO WITH STROKE , hemiplegia and foley dependent and sacral stage 4 decubitus . Upon my 2nd or 3rd visit I asked their expectation . Family said we want him get PT AND GET STRONG AND WALK HIM OUT Of here
    I TOLD THEM LOOKING AT HIS CONDITION IT IS Not going TO HAPPEN , Hospitalist, neurologist put SAR PHYSICIAN IN A DIFFICULT TASK OF SATISFYING FAMILY EXPECTATIONS AND THEY. THEMSELVES GET OUT OF SITUATION
    THIS MAY AT TIMES RESULT INTO LITIGATION SITUATION
    Hospital team in order to save their time , they leave this complex discussion in he hands of receiving doctor at SAR . This not ethical .

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related More Voices

More Voices Themes

Scroll to Top